An essay by Jennifer Jilks to fulfil course requirements: CTL 1110
In my research to create a class room to suit the new millenium, I have found a great deal of controversy surrounding the preponderance of attitudes that the ideal elementary class room includes computers. Tapscot (1998) tells us that the only way to surive in the Global Economy is to be wired in to the Internet. I disagree that computer should be placed in such importance to the learner.
One tool, underused by some, over used by others, is the computer. Yet, computers are not the answer to creating a multifaceted, holistic curriculum. Young children, especially, need to play, jump, love and laugh -and not in front of a keyboard. I passed the JKs, all 25 of them, parked in front of a computer waiting for the teacher or the volunteer mom to show them how to start drawing in McPix. How much more fun to pick up a crayon, smell that waxy smell and feel the rubbing over the texture of the paper as you chat with your neighbour?
Computers do appear to change how we think, theorize, remember, communicate, process information, solve problems, explore. Saddy (1996) wrote an extensive article on these topics. The premise, and I agree, is that children need to learn to make sense of the environment, best done in a hands-on, activity based manner. Piaget, amongst others, figured this out. It is not by viewing data and assimilating information that we learn, but by synthesising this information into knowledge.
Computers may give us data or information but they cannot give us knowledge. This comes with the manipulation of data and information, into complex, abstract ideas, formulated for the betterment of us all.
It is the left hemisphere processes language. The
right processes the visual, and the right hemisphere does not process
and filter information as critically as the left. We used to have to
trust our cave-woman eyes to warn us of danger. We have a biological
bias to react quickly and to accept what we see. "A picture is worth
a 1000 words."
Visually we do not critically assess the information. If we use our left brain, higher-order critical thinking skills, we can logically sort out fact from fiction. Most kids, viewing a multimedia CD Rom, some refer to them as "Edutainment Software", do not read the text, & absorb the information. They process the pretty pictures and watch the action. This is why sensible, logical, intelligent people can be entertained by something like "The Blair Witch Project", "Mission Impossible" or "How the Grinch Stole Xmas" when they are looking for entertainment. How much more creative to imagine the scene, setting, action than to have it created for you on the computer screen? My son uses the analogy: Dungeons & Dragons, an interactive, non-computer board game, is to video games, what books are to movies.
When we similarly view a simulation of a complex
system (computer modelling of scientific phenomena; behaviour of ant
colonies, Canada geese: V-formation. Saddy
proposes that this is how it is that we might recreate a system
without understanding it.
This is how Newton devised a new mathematical system (calculus), and
to show how planets orbit around the sun. If we recreated it on a
computer, perhaps we would not have had such an understanding of this
system.
Pythagorean theorem. The hypotenuse squared is equal to the squares of the two sides. We need to manipulate these ideas and work with them, to think about our thinking. Artificial intelligence *is* artificial.
"In the past, intelligence was used as a substitute for calculation. Now calculation is incredibly cheap, so you can be dumber." (Saddy, 1996, p.58)
Think of your Palm Pilots: "When you write things down, you don´t remember them as well. And worse than that, you don´t think about them deeply because you´re not committing them to memory, you´re committing them to electronics and paper."
Elementary students writing essays, parents have told me, think screen by screen in 3 or 4 paragraphs-worth. They do not see the big picture: the thread of the argument. They must be guided in this endeavour, do overviews and mind-maps and plan out their logical thoughts.
E-mail standards are lowering. Friends used to be careful about writing to me. Now it is acceptable to fling into cyberspace flawed pieces of writing, cute emoticons and inadequate pieces of work. In a 1988 piece of research at Perdue University, as discussed by Saddy, they found that students did write longer sentences and more words on a computer, but the longer sentences didn´t result in increased complexities of thought. "Word processors don´t make better writers.", they concluded, "They make more writers."
Visit three Internet sites, and you'll find three different birth dates for the same person...unreliable information abounds. Here we are relying on a tool to find something basic, and not being able to find accurate information. Often kids don´t know how to look it up information in an index and they are used to firing off one word work search topics, finding loads of information at their fingertips. They print the first piece of information available and figure their research is done.
How much more exciting to go to the Museum of Civilization and walk through exhibits, interact with the sites at the Science Museum in Toronto than to pop in a CD Rom and let real life pass you by. The Internet is very a sexy medium, but I am finding more and more children who are unable to look up information in an index, or to do some leg work to pursue a fact, if it doesn't come up on the search engine they have chosen. They become frozen in real-time!
Another strategy for creating a Holistic Approach is one which creates an environment Multi-age Learners (Wolk, 2001). There many opportunities for opting out of particular courses/classes and doing independent studies. Within each of these models is the understanding that we modify the assessment strategies, as well as the expectations and develop open-ended tasks for the students to pursue. The key lies in teacher education and in-service opportunities which will benefit all learners and meet their individual needs.
References:
Barkman, R. (1997) Patterns and the Eigth intelligence: The Building Tool Room.
Bensen, H. (1975) The Relaxation Response, Avon Books, Inc. USA
Chisholm, F. R., (2000) Work-Related Stress: Getting the Help You Need, After the Chalk Dust Settles,Toronto, ON: ETFO
Derman-Sparks, Louise, (1989) Anti-Bias Curriculum: Tools for Empowering Young Children, National Assoc. for the Education of Young Children, Washington:USA
Dunham, T.(1992) Stress in Teaching, London: Routledge
Eastman, Wayne, (1996), Avoiding Burnout through the Wellness Approach, 1996, ED399987
Elkind, Dr. D., The Hurried Child, Addison-Wesley Publ. co.
ETFO ( 2001) Blurred Vision: Rethinking the Ontario Curriculum, Toronto
Freire, P. (1971) Pedagy of the Oppressed, The Seabury press: NY
Gardner, H. , Multiple intelligences theories. A reading list of Multiple intelligences.
Gardner, H. (1993), Creating Minds: Biographies of famous, creative thinkers of our time, Basic Books, NY.
Gardner, H. (1998), "A Multiplicity of Intelligences", Scientific American: Exploring Intelligence, Winter, Vol. 9, ,#4 , p. 18-23:USA
Giroux, H. (1999a) Rage & Hope: Giroux on Freire, Perfectfit.org
Giroux, H. (1999b) Rage & Hope: What is the Role of Curriculum in Critical Pedagogy?
Goleman, D., (1995) , Emotional Intelligence, Bantam: NY
Hanson, P.G., The Joy of Stress
Haugland, S.W., Computers and Young Children, ERIC Digest ED438926
Hays, E., (1981) Twelve and One-Half Keys, Forest of Peace Books, Inc., Kansan, USA
Hendricks, G. & Wills, (1975) The Centering Book, Prentice-Hall, NJ
Holmes, W. N. (1999) The Myth of the Educational Computer, IEEE, Sept. 1999, 0018-9162/99
Jensen, E., (1998) Teaching With the Brain in Mind, ASCD: VA
Jones, A., (1993) How Much Did You Love? What Did You Learn?, Eastern Gate Publ., Millbrook, Ontario
Kessler, R. (2000) The Soul of Education, ASCD Publications, VI, USA
Livsey, R. C., (1999) The Courage to Teach: A Guide for Reflection and Renewal, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco: USA
Lumsden, (1998, March) Teacher Morale, College of Education, University of Oregon: Clearinghouse on Educational Management, ERIC #120
May, R., (1991) The Cry for Myth, Bantam Doubleday, NY
McLaren, P. (1998) Life in Schools: an introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education, Longman: NY
Miller, J., (1996) The Holistic Curriculum, OISE Press, Toronto, Canada
Millman, D., (1992) Quest for the Crystal Castle, A Peaceful Warrior Children's Book, H.J. Kramer, Inc., California, USA
Moore, T. (1992) Care of the Soul, HarperCollins Books, NY
Moore, T. (1994) Soul Mates, HarperCollins Books, NY
Morgan, H. (1996), "An Analysis of Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligence", Roeper Review, 18 (4), pp. 263-269: USA
Palmer, P.J. (1999) The Courage to Teach, Jossey-Bass, Inc. Publ., CA:USA
Peck, M.S., (1992) The Friendly Snowflake, Ariel Books, Kansas City, USA
Rud., A.Ag. (1992) A Place for Teacher Renewal, Columbia, NY: Teachers College Press
Saddy, G. , (June 1996), "Do computers change how we think?", Equinox Magazine , No. 87
Scolastico, R., (1988) The Earth Adventure, Hay House, CA, USA
Schultz, R. & Delisle, J. (1997) "School, Curriculum, and The good Life: Knowing The Self". Roper Review, 20 (2), pp. 99-104.
Senge, P., et al (2000) Schools That Learn, Doubleday, Inc., NY
Sherwood, K. (1988) Chakra Therapy: For Personal Growth & Healing, Llewellyn Publications, St. Paul MN
Tapscott, D. (1998) growing up digital [sic] , McGraw-Hill: USA.
Tapscott, D. (1995) The Digital Economy, , McGraw-Hill: USA.
Tomlinson, C.A., (2001) "The Rationale for Differentiated Instruction in Mixed Ability Classrooms", How To Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms, 2nd Ed., p. 11 - 12, Alexandria, VI: ASCD
Voss, N. (Nov./Dec. 1987) "Questioning Strategies for parents", GCT Magazine, pp. 37
Williams, L.V.(1983) Teaching for the Two-Sided Mind, Simon & Schuster, Inc, USA
Wolk, S. (2001) The Benefits of Exploratory Time, Educational Leadership, 59, (2), Oct. 2001, P. 56-59.
Zukav, G. (1989) The Seat of the Soul, Simon & Shuster, NY
~~~~~
[ Jennifer
Jilks | Articles
]